Albo & Oblon has begun reviewing and digesting important new bid protest decisions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States Court of Federal Claims — the federal bid protest courts.
Albo & Oblon are bid protest attorneys and government contract lawyers. Click here for a general overview of bid protest law in a simple question and answer format.
_____________________
- Bid Protest Successful Where Agency Failed to Perform “Best Value Tradeoff Analysis” (November 22, 2011) (Successful Bid Protest)
- Agency’s Use of Independent Government Cost Estimate (IGCE) was Rational (October 14, 2011)
- Contractor Wins Bid Protest by Arguing that “Class Waiver” of Customary Commercial Practices was Irrationally Applied (October 12, 2011) (Successful Bid Protest)
- Bid Protest Successful Where Agency Failed to Perform a “Best-Value Tradeoff Analysis” (September 27, 2011) (Successful Bid Protest)
- Solicitations Cannot Have Terms Contrary to Those Used in Customary Commercial Practice (September 16, 2011) (Successful Bid Protest)
- Contract Awarded to Company for Twice the Price of a Competitor is Still “Best Value” (September 13, 2011)
- Federal Court Slams Down Army for Following Informal Advice of GAO Lawyer on Corrective Actions in a Bid Protest (August 25, 2011) (Successful Bid Protest)
- In a Bid Protest, Who is a “Non-Responsible” Bidder? Who is a “Non-Responsive” Bidder? (August 12, 2011)
-Bid Protester Wins Protest Where the Agency Improperly Awards Contract to Company with an “Organizational Conflict of Interest” — (August 9, 2011) (Successful Bid Protest)
- Appellate Court slams Down Army Corps of Engineers for Following a GAO Recommendation in Bid Protest (July 14, 2011) (Successful Bid Protest)
